• Kitchen
    • How to Choose Cookware
      • A No-Nonsense Guide to Cookware Materials
      • Cladded sidewalls vs. disc-bottomed cookware
      • Cookware Thickness Database
      • Thermal Rankings: Gas
      • Thermal Rankings: Electric and Induction
      • Heat retention myths and facts
      • How to choose an enameled Dutch oven (Le Creuset, Staub, Lodge, etc.)
      • Lids: Glass vs Stainless vs Universal
      • Handles: Rivets vs Welds vs Screw-On
      • What’s the difference between 3-ply (tri-ply) and 5-ply and 7-ply?
    • How to Choose a Knife: In-Depth Product Reviews: Kitchen Knives, Sharpeners, Knife Blocks, and Other Knife Storage
    • How to organize pots and pans (and dishes, cutting boards, and lids) with racks and shelving
    • High-Powered Blenders: An In-Depth Review of Vitamix vs. Blendtec vs. Oster vs. Also-Rans
    • How to Choose Steamer and Pasta Inserts
    • Garlic Presses
    • Induction Stoves
    • How to Choose Sous Vide Equipment
      • In-Depth Product Review: ANOVA Precision Cooker (an Immersion Circulator for Sous Vide Cooking
      • Does pot material matter for sous vide cooking?
    • How To Choose a Cooktop
    • In-Depth Product Reviews: Silicone Spatulas, Turners, and Scrapers Comparison
  • Home
    • A Post-Plastic Home: Known and Unknown Dangers of Plastic, and Alternatives
    • Affordable Water Distillation
    • Sleep
      • Blue Light Special: How to get more sleep in one easy step
      • In-Depth Product Review: White Noise Generators as Sleep Aids
  • Body
    • Eat Poop or Wash Your Hands
    • In-Depth Product Review: A Guide to Feminine Hygiene Products (Menstrual Pads, Diva cups, etc.)
  • Science
    • Does cooking food create toxins and carcinogens?
    • Is Induction More Efficient Than Electric Coil or Gas?
    • Induction Interface Discs: Why They Don’t Work Well
    • Maillard Reactions (Why Food Tastes Good)
    • What’s the healthiest cooking oil?
    • Understanding Imperfect Science
  • Food
    • Emergency Meals – Fast, Easy Cooking for Busy People
    • Fake vs. Real Foods: A Savvy Buyer’s Guide on How to Identify Genuine Food Products and Forgeries
    • Garlic: anti-cancer and cardiovascular health benefits
    • Nutrition
      • The Green Smoothie is the Most Important Meal of the Day
      • Paleo Diet: It’s A Starting But Not Ending Point
    • Food Safety
    • What’s the healthiest cooking oil?
  • Books
    • In-Depth Product Review: Amazon Kindle Fire 7 (2015) Tablet
    • Cookbooks
      • In-Depth Book Review: The Cancer-Fighting Kitchen
  • Baby
    • Food and drink
      • Nutrition: Avoiding Palm Olein in Baby Formula
    • Safe Plastic Breast Milk Storage Bags: A Guide
  • Cleaning
    • Kitchen
      • In-Depth Product Review: Bar Keepers Friend (BKF)
  • Travel/Outdoors
    • In-Depth Product Review: Iwatani ZA-3HP Portable Butane Stove
    • Taking risk out of driving cars
  • Deals

CenturyLife.Org

You are here: Home / News / Science / Understanding Imperfect Science

Understanding Imperfect Science

Let me preface this entry by stating that I believe the scientific method to be one of the best ways to understand the universe. That said, people often have a very naive, almost religious faith in science. Just because something sounds science-y does not mean it is true. Do not ever be intimidated by people who attempt to convince you with something other than facts. It does not matter how prestigious their credentials are; people are fallible. On the other hand, don’t listen to scaremongers, either, as they make a living by stirring up controversy and selling snake oil.

Imperfect Science

Sometimes we know we don’t know the answer to something.

Sometimes, it’s even worse: we don’t know that we don’t know!

When it comes to human health, we know a lot more than our ancestors–at least we wash our hands and bathe more often, knowing that microscopic organisms can spread diseases.

But we still have a lot to learn. Science is messy and full of incentives to exaggerate in order to gain more prestige or a tenure-track position or a promotion. Example: This article about chocolate where the researcher deliberately set up a flawed study in the hopes of producing a false positive that “proved” that eating chocolate helps lose weight. (It doesn’t. But don’t let that stop you from relishing the occasional bite of chocolate.) Social Science studies are possibly even less likely to be true. Here is a widget to play with to see how different choices of variables influence the results of a study.

Also, humans are great at finding patterns in randomness/noise, so ideally you would want to see a study repeated or confirmed in some way before taking it as fact rather than the false positive that it may be.

Due to the above reasons, I read science articles with a skeptical eye; it can take a very long time before scientists understand the nuances of a substance. For example, there is a saying among toxicologists that the “dose makes the poison,” meaning small amounts of a chemical may be neutral or even positive for your health, even if larger amounts injure your health. Copper is necessary for life; you will get sick or even die if you don’t get enough copper in your diet. Yet overdosing on copper can kill you. Similarly, water is necessary for life; you will die without enough water intake. But you can overdose and die on water if you drink too much of it in too short a timespan.1

Since there’s so much junk science out there (think studies about how cigarettes don’t cause lung cancer paid for by tobacco companies), I rely on citations to government research labs, top research institutes (e.g., the Mayo Clinic), top journals (e.g., Nature), and studies done by major research universities. And I take things slowly; I don’t want to clog up this site with “news” of dubious value. So I won’t post about science stuff unless I think it’s truly interesting and not junk science. Relax, and enjoy the leisurely pace of the Science section of this site!

FOOTNOTES

Show 1 footnote

  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12053855 See also “Woman dies after water-drinking contest” accessed at http://www.nbcnews.com/id/16614865/ ↩

Copyright © 2013-2023 CenturyLife.Org · All Rights Reserved. We're independent. We don't have sponsors or get free/discounted stuff, so we don't get pressure to say nice things about bad products. We buy and use stuff ourselves. To pay for website maintenance, we link to sites which pay us a small referral fee, at no cost to you. To support this site, you can shop by clicking on links to retailers. CenturyLife.Org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Questions? Contact us here.

Popular Posts

• How to Choose Cookware

• How to choose a portable induction cooker

• How to choose an enameled dutch oven

• How to choose clad/tri-ply stainless (Is All-Clad Worth it?)

• Even heating rankings: gas and electric

Copyright © 2013-2023 CenturyLife.Org · All Rights Reserved. Disclaimers